24 ÷åðâíÿ 2008ð. â³äáóäåòüñÿ íîâèé ñóäîâèé ðîçãëÿä ïîçîâó ÅÏË ïðîòè ̳íïðèðîäè ùîäî îñêàðæåííÿ âèñíîâê³â åêîëîã³÷íî¿ åêñïåðòèçè ùîäî ñïîðóäæåííÿ êàíàëó Äóíàé-×îðíå ìîðå. Ñïðàâà áóäå ñëóõàòèñÿ ó Ãîñïîäàðñüêîìó ñóä³ Ëüâ³âñüêî¿ îáëàñò³.
Ùå â ê³íö³ 2006ðîêó ÅÏË ïîäàëà ïîçîâ ïðî îñêàðæåííÿ âèñíîâê³â ̳íïðèðîäè ùîäî ñïîðóäæåííÿ êàíàëó Äóíàé-×îðíå ìîðå, ²² ÷åðãà. Ïðîòå ñóää³, ùî ðîçãëÿäàëè ñïðàâó, çðîáèëè âèñíîâîê ïðî íåìîæëèâ³ñòü ðîçãëÿäàòè äàíèé ïîçîâ çà ïðàâèëàìè Êîäåêñó àäì³í³ñòðàòèâíîãî ñóäî÷èíñòâà ³ â³äïîâ³äíî ãîñïîäàðñüêèì ñóäîì Ëüâ³âñüêî¿ îáëàñò³. ϳñëÿ îñêàðæåííÿ ÅÏË òàêîãî ð³øåííÿ â àïåëÿö³éíîìó ïîðÿäêó, àïåëÿö³éíà ³íñòàíö³¿ íå ïîãîäèëàñÿ ³ç òàêèìè âèñíîâêàìè ³ íàïðàâèëà ñïðàâó íà íîâèé ðîçãëÿä ïî ñóò³ äî ñóäó ïåðøî¿ ³íñòàíö³¿.
Ðîçãëÿä ïèòàííÿ ùîäî çàêîííîñò³ ïîáóäîâè äðóãî¿ ÷åðãè êàíàëó Äóíàé ×îðíå ìîðå íàáóâຠîñîáëèâî¿ àêòóàëüíîñò³ ñàìå çàðàç, êîëè óðÿä Óêðà¿íè ïîîá³öÿâ ì³æíàðîäí³é ñï³ëüíîñò³ íà çóñòð³÷³ ñòîð³í êîíâåíö³¿ Åñïî â Áóõàðåñò³ â òðàâí³ ïåðåãëÿíóòè îñòàòî÷íå ð³øåííÿ ùîäî ñïîðóäæåííÿ ²² ÷åðãè êàíàëó.
ÌÁÎ «Åêîëîã³ÿ-ïðàâî-ëþäèíà»,
êîíòàêòíà îñîáà: Ìåëåíü Î.Ì., êåð³âíèê þðèäè÷íîãî â³ää³ëó
Ñóäåáíàÿ áèòâà çà Äóíàé ïðîäîëæàåòñÿ
24 èþíÿ 2008ã. íàçíà÷åíî ñóäåáíîå çàñåäàíèå ïî èñêó ÝÏË ïðîòèâ Ìèíïðèðîäû îòíîñèòåëüíî îñïàðèâàíèÿ çàêëþ÷åíèÿ ãîñóäàðñòâåííîé ýêîëîãè÷åñêîé ýêñïåðòèçû ñîîðóæåíèÿ êàíàëà Äóíàé-×åðíîå ìîðå. Äåëî áóäåò ñëóøàòüñÿ â êîììåð÷åñêîì ñóäå Ëüâîâñêîé îáëàñòè.
Åùå â êîíöå 2006 ãîäà ÝÏË ïîäàëà èñê î ïðèçíàíèè íåäåéñòâèòåëüíûìè çàêëþ÷åíèÿ ýêñïåðòèçû Ìèíïðèðîäû îòíîñèòåëüíî ñîîðóæåíèÿ êàíàëó Äóíàé-×åðíîå ìîðå, ²² î÷åðåäü. Íî ñóäüè, ÷òî ðàññìàòðèâàëè äåëî, ñäåëàëè íåïðàâèëüíûå âûâîäû î íåâîçìîæíîñòè ðàññìîòðåíèÿ ýòîãî ñïîðà çà ïðàâèëàìè Êîäåêñà àäìèíèñòðàòèâíîãî ñóäîïðîèçâîäñòâà è ñîîòâåòñòâåííî õîçÿéñòâåííûì ñóäîì Ëüâîâñêîé îáëàñòè. Ïîñëå îñïàðèâàíèÿ ÝÏË òàêîãî ðåøåíèÿ â àïåëëÿöèîííîì ïîðÿäêå, àïåëëÿöèîííûé ñóä íå ñîãëàñèëñÿ ñ òàêèìè âûâîäàìè è íàïðàâèë äåëî íà íîâîå ðàññìîòðåíèå ïî ñóòè â ñóä ïåðâîé èíñòàíöèè.
Ðàññìîòðåíèå âîïðîñà çàêîííîñòè ñòðîèòåëüñòâà âòîðîå î÷åðåäè êàíàëó Äóíàé -×åðíîå ìîðå íàáèðàåò îñîáåííîé àêòóàëüíîñòè ñåé÷àñ, êîãäà ïðàâèòåëüñòâî Óêðàèíû îáåùàëî ìåæäóíàðîäíîìó ñîîáùåñòâó íà âñòðå÷è ñòîðîí êîíâåíöèè Åñïî â Áóõàðåñòå â ìàå ýòîãî ãîäà ïåðåñìîòðåòü êîíå÷íîå ðåøåíèå î ñòðîèòåëüñòâå ²² î÷åðåäè êàíàëà.
Court battle for the Danube continues
On 24of June 2008 the court scheduled its hearing of the suit filed by EPL against the Ministry of Environmental Protection of Ukraine challenging its ecological expertise decisions of the Danube-Black Sea canal construction (phase II). The case will be heard by the Lviv Commercial Court.
In the end of 2006 EPL filed suit challenging legality of the ecological expertise decisions of the Environmental Ministry concerning construction of the phase II of the Danube-Black sea canal. But judges considering this case made wrong decision on non-applicability of the Code of Administrative Proceedings in this case and thus the lack of jurisdiction of the Lviv Commercial Court over this case. EPL filed an appeal and appeal court did not support this opinion. Appeal court sent this case back to the first instance court for consideration.
Consideration of the issue of lawfulness of construction of the phase II of the Danube-Black Sea canal is becoming very important these days because the government of Ukraine made a promise to international community during the meeting of the parties of ESPOO convention in May 2008 in Bucharest to reconsider its final decision concerning phase II.